Amy Liz Martin
  • Conversations on PR
  • February11th

    Before I begin, I must apologize for not posting in a while. I’ve been incredibly busy in my new role as the communications department’s sole person at the National Indian Education Association. We’ve planned three events in the past 6 months and I’ve also been revamping their communications plan and redesigning the website in spare time. Posts will be more frequent in the upcoming months – I promise!

    This past week, the National Indian Education Association (NIEA) held its 14th annual Legislative Summit in Washington, DC. It was a gathering of Native American educators, tribal leaders and students who are passionate about better policies and increased funding for American Indian, Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian students. The event included in-depth advocacy and legislative training, meetings with U.S. Congress Members and their staff and updates from other education organizations.

    This was my first time doing media relations and membership communication for an advocacy event, so I had quite a bit to learn. Here are a few of those lessons:

    Rally around a Mantra

    I learned this lesson a long time ago, but rediscovered it’s power as we planned for this Legislative Summit. Ideally, we wanted to create a tagline that reflected both the needs of our delegates but was also relevant to policymakers. Once we selected “Restoring the Trust in Native Education,” the theme effectively wove into speeches and was later echoed by delegates as they were in their Hill meetings.  It reminded me once again of the importance to focus attention to one or two key points.

    Connect with press secretaries and bring a camera

    If I were to revise former President Teddy Roosevelt’s clever quip, I would say “speak softly and carry a big camera.” During our second day of the Summit, Members of Congress and representatives from the Administration and Federal agencies spoke to our group about why education is important to them and how to approach their Hill visits the next day. I wanted to make sure that I captured every moment on video and film to use for our membership magazine this month.

    As I’m taking pictures of Congressmen and women, press secretaries continually approached me to see if they could use the photos. I obliged and asked, in return, that they put our press release out to their media lists about the summit. They were happy to do so and I was able to network, snap photos, and live-tweet at the same time. Many of them also retweeted our efforts, like Rep. Xavier Becerra:

    Those contacts came in handy the next day since I could not possibly attend all 40 Congressional meetings. I was able to ask the staffers to take pictures of our delegates with their staff, which enabled me to attend more. Aaah, I love strategy!

    Never underestimate the power of radio

    Our membership truly values radio broadcasting above other media. Some of our communities do not have access to phone lines, much less a television broadcast – making me strategize a bit more on how to effectively communicate with all of our members.

    I was able to have our State of Native Education address broadcast on Native America Calling, a popular call-in radio broadcast for all of Indian Country. I was ecstatic to have them cover our event because it amplified our audience beyond Capitol Hill, but also down to the local communities. What I didn’t expect was that other public radio outlets would want to interview our members while they were on the Hill. I later learned that the relationships I cultivated with press secretaries the day before helped land 3 interviews during our day on the Hill. This leads to an additional insight…If you have a day on Capitol Hill with 200 delegates and more than 40 Congressional meetings, it is easier to have reporters carry a tape recorder than a video camera.

    In all, NIEA’s Legislative Summit was a success, but my poor feet paid the price and allowed me to learn one final lesson: Media relations days on Capitol Hill require running shoes.

  • September3rd

    There’s no mistaking it. The interaction between social media and news media outlets is revolutionizing the way we receive information. Wednesday’s Discovery Communications hostage situation was a prime example of how a verified tip on Twitter can break the news about a crisis.

    I’ll admit, I was glued to the #discovery hashtag (and even alerted the Washington Post Twitter account that they needed to use that as well). For me, it was a way to grab as much information as possible, while still watching breaking news from TV reporters. However, I thought Lisa Byrne’s (@DCEventJunkie) Twitter comment hit the mark: “BREAKING NEWS: Everyone’s a Reporter.” At that moment, everyone felt like they were actually a journalist, retweeting and distributing accurate information. However, she and I shared the same sentiment in that statement. Just because you have some of the data, it doesn’t mean that you have an accurate, fully reliable story. Let’s face it:

    “News” and “information” are not the same thing

    Let me clarify here, as I’m sure I may have a few of my social media friends ready for discussion (and I welcome it!). We saw incredible amounts information come through the Twitter lines, from Discovery employee accounts of what was happening on the ground to those who were conveying thoughts from their Discovery friends. As my friend Alex Priest pointed out in yesterday’s blog entry for Technorati, Twitter was a great spot for crowdsourcing information, for reporters to possibly find sources through Foursquare or gain potentially accurate details. I believe that was an important outcome from this entire situation.

    However, “information” doesn’t necessarily equal “news”. News is factual and should be verified by sources. Journalists, whether on social media or more traditional news outlets, are trying their best to ascertain if the information is reliable or not. Ultimately, their necks are on the line with their news outlet and they better have the information correct. That level of accountability is a must and is something that the general public relies on.

    That said, I think we can’t deny what we witnessed on the #Discovery hashtag on Wed. Social networks, especially Twitter, gained credibility as being an information source. Even when some misleading information circulated, such as the picture of the SWAT team member who mistakingly was verified as the gunman (and distributed on some news outlets as such), many were there to debunk the false information. However, credibility was still a huge concern when the false info spreads too far too fast and isn’t caught with a discerning eye. Some have claimed that corrections of the misinformation from the above mentioned picture spread quickly, but I’ve heard from many people who didn’t see the correct information and are still spreading false statements about the TweetPhoto.

    There was a deluge of information out there, a situation that has its pros and cons. While it was great for getting information, the major con was that sometimes the correct news couldn’t be verified and reach the masses because there was too much noise. Next time, here are some things to consider while watching breaking news over a hashtag:

    1. Authority belongs to those who can truly verify information – trust those authority figures: News outlets who have discussed the information with the police or SWAT teams are reliable. When looking at media relations from an “authority” point of view, I have a priority checklist: police, media, corporation or party involved, bystanders. Essentially, 90% of us on Twitter were bystanders and couldn’t prove the information was fact.
    2. When in crisis, emotions run high and information MUST be cleared as fact: If you’ve been in a crisis situation (whether directly or indirectly by knowing someone in crisis), then you know how crazy the environment can be. Many people aren’t thinking logically and rationally, and can easily spit out information that isn’t true. I’m not saying this necessarily was the case with #Discovery, but information needs to be fact-checked simply because too many emotions are in the mix. When using social media as a source for breaking information, we need to take everything said with a grain of salt until it is verified. Remember, quantity doesn’t necessarily trump quality.
    3. Spread the information – as long as you’re 99% sure that it is accurate: Most journalists have an internal compass to make sure all of the facts are correct before publishing. As social media people, we need to develop that same trait instead of blasting out info that is completely false at times. I’ve been guilty of it to and learned those lessons the hard way. Before you hit the retweet button, think twice.

    All of that said, I enjoyed watching the #Discovery hashtag and seeing it come into its own as a way to get information to news media. I also greatly applaud the efforts of all the news media, especially WUSA 9, ABC7, NBC Washington, the Washington Post, FOX News – your coverage was phenomenal! In the end, I think that Paul Farhi, Washington Post reporter, and Allan Horlick, president and general manager of WUSA-TV said it best in yesterday’s Washington Post article:

    “But as rich as Wednesday’s Twitter feed was, it was merely a starting point for reporters. ‘The initial information may have come to us through these tools, but we have to apply the old-media skills of vetting and serving as a filter’ for what’s accurate, said Horlick.”

This blog is protected by Dave\'s Spam Karma 2: 1238 Spams eaten and counting...