Amy Liz Martin
  • Conversations on PR
  • August25th

    I went on a mission this summer to understand a little more about responsible crowdsourcing. It started by doing a communications audit for a client. I remember sitting across the table and telling them that I could find valuable information about their marketshare by leveraging social media and online resources.

    Their response? “Really? Do you think that they will give us accurate information? Will I be able to take this information back to my colleagues and will they believe it?” I anticipated those questions about validity even though crowdsourcing can be a favored method of data-collection. Everyone has valuable input to give, although most of it needs to be vetted to determine how applicable it can be. Once the audit was complete and I presented to the client, we moved forward with targeted, strategic communications that proved successful – all because we asked the right questions through our social media channels and carefully parsed through responses.

    It made me think about the value of “responsible” crowdsourcing: ask the questions, generate conversation and sift through the information in ways that provide the most constructive knowledge for your project. Even media outlets such as The Guardian are putting money behind the effort. I think Christina Fink, founder of Flickr and Hutch, does this best. In Devin Leonard’s July 28th Wired article, he boils her philosophy down: “Get people talking about themselves — their opinions, tastes, beliefs, idiosyncrasies. Then, once they have shared enough information, mine that data for correlations that provide precisely tailored recommendations for each user.”

    Inspired by what I saw professionally, I started a new crowdsourcing project by taking Jeff Howe’s original idea of “The Tinkerer” and applying it personally.  Basically, I let you all control a bit of my hopes and dreams, from American Idol auditions to my latest adventure, Costa Rica.

    Jeep-Boat-Jeep ride to Arenal Volcano

    It started in June when Dave and I knew that we needed to take a trip – pronto! I’ve planned countless international trips for others and desperately needed to use my passport. Once we determined the place and purchased flights (roundtrip, $350pp), I put out the feelers. With a few simple questions and some cursory research on Costa Rica, I was flooded with information! People seemed to have an incredibly positive experience in certain places and highly recommended to stay away from others. We fashioned our trip based upon all of those suggestions, all the while keeping in mind how we vacation and our desires while in-country.

    That said, here are a few lessons I learned in the process:

    1. Know your strengths, weaknesses and desires (don’t expect crowdsourcing to provide them): We both knew that we wanted to see a lot of amazing plants and animals, but there were too many places to do so in Costa Rica. By listening to the best places to view what we  wanted, we were able to relax more at each destination instead of rushing around the countryside.
    2. Mine for resources: As we always research our competition in marketing, we also need to see what they provide and if it can be a helpful tool for ourselves. While this applies more in marketing than personal life, its great to see what resources others can provide. For example, I found that Rosetta Stone was doing a beta test for new Spanish language-learning software.  This proved incredibly helpful to revive 6+ years of Spanish classes.
    3. Polish off the gems: Sometimes, one piece of crowdsourced info can make all the difference. I was recommended to take the jeep-boat-jeep to Arenal Volcano and fly Nature Air, but was highly cautioned about the airport taxes that come without warning.  When we arrived, we were prepared.

    So, I must say thank you to all of you who provided information. The key is to get people talking about what they love and advise against, and base opinions from there.  Experiment successful!

    For pictures and commentary from our trip, please visit my Flickr site and Dave’s page as well.

  • July27th

    As a social media junkie enthusiast, I’m always on the lookout of the best practices and trends to see how I can apply it to public relations. As I was researching last week, I was alerted by some Twitter followers that a popular DC company’s Twitter account had thousands of followers, but they only followed one person. One.

    Ok, thats a problem, but how are they interacting with their followers? I asked myself. Are they asking customers what they like about the problem? Are they addressing customer service issues? Or are they simply producing 140 characters of canned marketing-speak?

    Their tweets told the truth. Almost 90% of the messages were talking about upcoming promotions and places where the product would appear on television. When I did a little searching about the company’s public relations efforts, I was told that a third party was doing a “huge part of their PR” by “sending out a tweet or two everyday.”

    At first, I was shocked. How could you call PR sending out a tweet or two a day? It is so much more! However, this example simply highlights the line between PR and marketing and how it has a tendency to blur.

    In marketing, success means that your efforts increased product sales. You want to position your product, company, or service in such a way that makes consumers really flock toward what you have to offer. No doubt that social media is a huge part of that effort. However, sometimes social media marketing efforts can be characterized as sending out messages that are more of a pitch instead of a conversation starter.

    The ultimate goal for PR is to ENGAGE people, not just shout at them. When it is done well, PR pros can create a conversation by mentioning a few key messages here and there, and seeing who their key influencers are who can keep that discussion going. It means to @ reply to fans of your product/service and ask questions of your audience to solicit real information about their demographic. As Edelman Digital’s SVP David Armano’s said in his interview with Forbes’s Bruce Upbin, engagement is defined through “interactions in a number of different ways, ranging from conversations to transactions.”

    The reason the lines get blurry is because marketing and PR pros are using the same tools to have somewhat different, unique outcomes. At last week’s Social Media Club DC Breakfast, Erin Orr (inspired by Chris Brogan) gave this wonderful breakdown on how we should incorporate social media in our day:

    For two hours a day on social media – use this formula:

    • 30 minutes listening to your key audiences
    • 1 hour connecting & interacting with those people
    • 30 minutes publishing new content

    That said, as marketing and PR professionals, we must make sure we consider social media to be a tool in our workspace, not the product itself. I think we’re missing the delicious satisfaction of a job well done if we only talk about how many times we’ve tweeted instead of capturing the rich conversations had because of our messaging.